- Verified by BizGlocal
Feature-Rich AI Platform For Legal Research, Contract Review And Drafting
- 350+
- 2022
- San Francisco, CA
- 5+
About Harvey
Industry leader in connected fleet operations
Market Position
One of the best-funded legal AI companies, competing with Legora, CoCounsel, Spellbook and contract platforms such as Ironclad, and naming 80+ AmLaw 100 firms among its customers.
Innovation Focus
Agents that plan and run multi-step legal work, review tables across large document sets, playbook-based contract review, and routing between models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google.
Core Strengths
Breadth of legal products on one platform, deep document management integrations, licensed legal research content, regional data residency, and a long list of security certifications.
Use Cases
Contract review and redlining, due diligence, legal research, drafting, regulatory monitoring, legal intake, litigation document analysis and portfolio-wide contract reporting.
Core Products & Solutions
Assistant And Agents
Ask legal questions, upload files and receive answers or editable drafts, or hand multi-step work to agents. Harvey says agents run in parallel, can be scheduled, show a plan for approval and log each step with citations.
Vault
Vault stores up to 100,000 documents per vault and extracts key data into review tables for comparison across many files. It syncs with iManage, SharePoint and Google Drive and supports permission controls and external sharing.
Contract Intelligence
Harvey detects the contract type, reviews it against your playbook, and returns redlines. Teams can compare live negotiations with accepted terms and track liability caps, governing law, renewals and notice periods across a portfolio.
Knowledge And Research
Answers draw on legal databases, the web, EDGAR, EUR-Lex and your own knowledge bases. Harvey names LexisNexis, Wolters Kluwer and SCC Online as content partners and cites a pipeline of 500+ legal sources.
Word Add-In And Workflows
The Word add-in drafts and edits from natural language prompts using precedents, manages playbooks with version history and runs one-click tasks such as translation, anonymization and template filling. Structured workflows guide multi-step tasks.
Connector Library, Spaces And Intake
Security-reviewed connectors include iManage, NetDocuments, Box, Docusign, Outlook, Gmail, Slack and Ironclad, plus custom MCP connectors. Spaces support shared work with clients and co-counsel, and Intake routes legal requests from the business.
Pricing Overview
Mid-Sized And Boutique Firms
Law firms of roughly 15 to 150 lawyers, the range Harvey names on its mid-sized firm page
Custom
Pricing
Custom quote, with no published rate
- Harvey lists a Customer Success Manager and Legal Engineers who help set up a first workflow
- Harvey Academy training and Word integration are listed
- The page offers only a Request a Demo path, with no self-serve signup or trial
- Third-party sources report a starting price near $1,200 per lawyer per month, not confirmed by Harvey
- Those sources also report a minimum of about 20 to 25 seats and a 12-month term
In-House Legal Teams
Corporate legal departments handling contracts, intake, regulatory work and outside counsel
Custom
Pricing
Custom quote, with no published rate
- Business Intake routes requests to the right agent or lawyer
- Contract review runs against a playbook, form or template with tracked-change edits
- Horizon Scanning tracks regulatory and legislative changes
- Secure Spaces let teams work with business partners and outside counsel
- Harvey offers an in-house ROI calculator but no price list
Large Law Firms And Enterprises
AmLaw 100 firms and large corporations rolling Harvey out firmwide
Custom
Pricing
Custom enterprise agreement, with no published rate
- Third-party sources say accounts often start with a few hundred licenses
- SAML SSO, audit logs and IP allow-listing are listed as default enterprise controls
- Data residency options cover the US, the EU and Switzerland, and Australia
- Command Center offers usage analytics and benchmarking
- Data processing terms and the security addendum are part of the contract
Who Is Harvey Best For?
Small Businesses
1-25 EmployeesGenerally not a fit today. Harvey has no self-serve signup, no published price and no free trial, and third-party reports cite roughly 20 to 25 seat minimums. Owners without an in-house legal team may prefer lighter Word-based tools.
Mid-Market Companies
26-100 EmployeesPossible for companies with a dedicated legal function that reviews many contracts. Harvey says it is designed for firms of every size and lists 2,300+ mid-sized and small firms, but it gives no breakdown by size. Confirm seat minimums before a demo.
Enterprise Companies
100+ EmployeesThe core audience. Customers named on the site include Deutsche Telekom, Comcast, HubSpot, GE Aerospace, CVS Health and Bayer, with SSO, audit logs, regional hosting and 24/7 monitoring that suit procurement and security review.
Law Firms And In-House Legal Departments
Any SizeLegal teams that process high volumes of contracts, diligence and research gain the most from Vault, playbooks and agents.
Measurable Impact & Benefits
25+
Hours Saved Monthly
Average time saved per typical user, reported by Harvey, with power users cited at 35 to 50+ hours
95%
Faster Batch Review
Reduction in time to review a large batch of trading agreements at Bridgewater, per Harvey’s Vault page
95%+
Active Adoption At CMS
Share of the 3,000+ CMS lawyers using Harvey by summer 2025 who were active users, per the CMS story
80%+
Report Better Work
Adecco Group legal professionals reporting significant gains in quality and speed, per its General Counsel quoted by Harvey
96%
Key-Term Extraction Accuracy
Accuracy figure Harvey publishes for Vault, with no methodology given
100,000
Documents Per Vault
Maximum files, emails and queries a single vault holds, per Harvey’s Vault page
3,500+
Legal Organizations
Customer count reported by Harvey across 85+ countries, while a September 2026 trade report cited nearly 2,500 organizations
80+
AmLaw 100 Firms
Large US law firms Harvey says use the platform, alongside 200,000+ professionals
Harvey Real reviews
Our Rating:
4.3
- Verified Users
- Verified Users
Compare Alternatives
See how Harvey stacks up against competitors
Get Your Free Checklist
Enter your email to download instantly
No spam. Instant access. Unsubscribe anytime.
Download
Spam
Forever
Harvey’s Pros & Cons
Balanced evaluation to help you make an informed decision
Strengths
- Broad platform covering research, Vault analysis, contract review, drafting and agents
- Playbook-based contract review and redlining, including inside Word
- Document management sync with iManage, SharePoint and Google Drive
- Connector library with custom MCP support and admin controls
- SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001 and AIUC-1 listed
- Contractual no-training commitment and US, EU and Australia data residency
- Routes work across OpenAI, Anthropic and Google models
Limitations
- No public pricing, trial or self-serve signup, with third-party seat minimums reported
- Reported pricing near $1,200 per seat per month is high for small teams
- Built for legal professionals, with no stated option for non-lawyer small businesses
- Case study results are vendor-reported, and few include numbers
- Public reviews are few, with 33 on G2 and no Capterra reviews
- AI outputs still need lawyer review, since legal AI can produce errors
Our Verdict
Harvey earns its place in BizGlocal’s Best in Features list for AI legal and contract review because it puts an assistant, agents, Vault review tables, playbook-based contract review, licensed research content, a Word add-in and a connector library in a single platform. Large law firms and corporate legal teams get SSO, audit logs, regional hosting and a long certification list. The trade-offs are access and cost. Harvey publishes no pricing, trial or plan tiers, third-party reports describe seat minimums and annual terms, and most small businesses will find it out of reach. Buyers should request a quote, run a pilot on their own contracts, confirm data handling terms in writing, and compare Spellbook and Ironclad before committing.
Resources
Resources & Documentation
Detailed materials for deeper evaluation
Platform Overview
How agents, Vault, Knowledge, Spaces and Command Center work together
Contract Intelligence
Playbooks, redlining, negotiation support and portfolio reporting
Vault Product Page
Review tables, 100,000-document capacity and DMS sync
Knowledge Product Page
Legal databases, EDGAR, EUR-Lex and cross-jurisdictional research
Security And Compliance
Certifications, data residency, no-training commitment and access controls
Customer Stories
Published stories from CMS, Reed Smith, Dentsu, O’Melveny and others
Help Center
Guides for Assistant, Vault, workflows, models and admin setup
ROI Calculator
Estimate time savings for in-house legal teams
What to Know
What to Know Before Buying
-
Start with a demo and a defined pilot use case -
Build playbooks from your own precedents before scaling
-
Plan for Legal Engineer support
-
Plan for iManage, SharePoint, NetDocuments or Google Drive for documents, Word and Outlook for daily work, and Docusign, Slack or Ironclad connectors, with admin approval of each connector.
-
Vault holds up to 100,000 documents per vault, and Harvey states customers range from boutique firms to AmLaw 100 firms, with regional instances for the US, EU and Australia.
-
Pricing is quote-only, so ask about seat minimums, implementation, training, premium research content and renewal uplifts. Third-party figures near $1,200 per seat per month are unconfirmed by Harvey.
-
Moving from another legal AI or contract tool means rebuilding playbooks, re-uploading or syncing document libraries and retraining users.
-
Third-party reports describe 12-month commitments, while Harvey says its Platform Agreement bars training on customer data and its Security Addendum covers incident response, so review terms with your counsel.
Alternatives
Compare Alternatives
See how Harvey stacks up against competitors
Ironclad is a contract lifecycle management platform covering create, review, sign, store, analyze and fulfill, with quote-based pricing, while Harvey is a broader legal AI platform that also covers research and agents. Harvey lists an Ironclad connector.
Spellbook centers on a Word add-in and a multi-document agent called Associate, with custom pricing by license count and a self-serve 7-day free trial, while Harvey adds Vault, Knowledge and a connector library and publishes no trial.
Get Started
Ready to Get Started?
Get personalized recommendations from top 3 vendors
By submitting, you agree to receive recommendations from verified vendors. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Are You a Software Vendor?
List your company and get in front of decision-makers actively searching for solutions.
FAQ’s
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Harvey
Harvey publishes no prices and sells by quote after a demo. Third-party sources report a starting point near $1,200 per lawyer per month, a minimum of about 20 to 25 seats and 12-month terms, but Harvey has not confirmed these.
Harvey offers no self-serve plan or free trial, and its mid-sized page names firms of roughly 15 to 150 lawyers. It does not say whether smaller firms qualify, so small businesses should ask sales and compare lighter tools.
Harvey lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001 and AIUC-1, and says it does not use inputs, outputs or uploaded documents to train underlying models. Request its Trust Center for tenant isolation and encryption details.
Customers can keep data in the US, the EU and Switzerland, or Australia, and the login menu offers regional instances for each. Harvey also announced TX-RAMP Level 2 certification on October 8, 2026.
Document sync covers iManage, SharePoint and Google Drive, and the connector library names NetDocuments, Box, Docusign, Outlook, Gmail, Slack, Jira and Ironclad, plus custom MCP connectors.
Yes. Contract Intelligence reviews contracts against your playbook and returns redlines, and the Word add-in drafts and edits from prompts using precedents. A lawyer should still check every output before it is relied on.
Harvey uses models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google, and its Auto mode picks models for each sub-task. If your admin enables the model selector, users can choose a model manually in Assistant and Vault.
Common alternatives include Spellbook, Ironclad, Legora, CoCounsel and Luminance, which differ in pricing transparency, Word focus, contract lifecycle features and firm size fit.