- Verified by BizGlocal
AI-Native Code Editor With Agents, Bugbot And Its Own Models
- 300+
- 2022
- San Francisco, CA
- 50,000+
About Cursor
Industry leader in connected fleet operations
Market Position
One of the fastest-growing developer tools, with more than 1 million daily active users and customers including NVIDIA, Uber, Adobe, Salesforce and PwC.
Innovation Focus
Composer 2.5 models for long-running tasks, cloud agents and automations, Bugbot and joint model training with SpaceX.
Core Strengths
An editor built around AI, autonomous agents, AI code review, model choice and enterprise admin controls.
Use Cases
Feature development, large refactors, code review, debugging, codebase upgrades and parallel agent work on multiple branches.
Core Products & Solutions
Agent
An autonomous coding agent that plans and makes multi-file changes inside the editor.
Cloud Agents And Automations
Agents that run in cloud environments in the background, so developers can work on several tasks in parallel.
Bugbot
AI code reviews that integrate with GitHub pull requests to catch bugs before merging.
Composer And Grok Models
Cursor’s own Composer 2.5 model and Grok 4.5 to 4.7 models in a weekly usage pool, plus third-party models at API list price.
Tab Completions
Predictive multi-line completions and edits as developers type.
Enterprise Controls
SCIM provisioning, audit logs, advanced admin controls, pooled usage and invoice billing on Enterprise.
Pricing Overview
Plus
Individual developers wanting basic AI coding
$8/month
$8/month, or $80/year
- Base weekly usage pool for Cursor and Grok models
- Agent access
- Models at fixed settings
- No Auto mode, Cloud Agents or Automations
- No Bugbot or third-party models
- Good entry point for light AI coding
Premium, Super And Ultra
Professional developers using agents daily
Premium
$30/month
Premium $30/month ($300/year); Super $100/month; Ultra $200/month
- Premium includes 4x Plus usage
- Super includes 15x Plus usage, with priority model access at peak times
- Ultra includes 50x Plus usage and earliest access to new products
- Cloud Agents and Automations
- Bugbot AI code reviews
- Third-party models billed at API list price from prepaid credit
Teams And Enterprise
Engineering teams and organizations
Teams
$30
Teams $30, $100 or $200 per seat/month; Enterprise custom pricing
- Seat usage matches its individual tier
- Centralized billing and usage analytics
- Cursor Router for cost or intelligence-based model routing
- Enterprise pooled usage across Grok and Cursor
- SCIM, audit logs and advanced admin controls
- Enterprise priority support and invoice billing
Who Is Cursor Best For?
Small Businesses
1-25 EmployeesPremium gives small dev teams Agent, cloud agents and Bugbot for $30 per seat, though third-party model use adds cost.
Mid-Market Companies
26-100 EmployeesA strong fit for engineering teams wanting faster shipping, as at Upwork, which reports about 50% more code shipped.
Enterprise Companies
100+ EmployeesThe strongest fit: deployed at more than half of the Fortune 500, with pooled usage, SCIM, audit logs and priority support.
Teams Running Large Refactors And Upgrades
Any SizeEngineering groups facing big codebase changes benefit from cloud agents working in parallel, as Coinbase and Sentry report.
Measurable Impact & Benefits
2-5x
Engineering Velocity At monday.com
Reported by monday.com’s Senior R&D Team Lead.
50%
More Code Shipped At Upwork
Upwork also reports 25%+ more pull requests and PRs more than twice as large.
60%
Of Engineers At Rippling
Rippling grew from 150 to 500+ engineers on Cursor in a few weeks.
800+
Engineers At Trimble
Trimble rolled Cursor out across its engineering organization.
70%+
Engineer Adoption At Brex
More than 70% of Brex engineers use Cursor.
Months To Days
Refactoring At Coinbase
Coinbase says refactoring and upgrades now take days instead of months.
12
Agent Branches Merged Daily At Sentry
Sentry merges a dozen agent-built branches every day.
50%+
Of The Fortune 500
Cursor is deployed at more than half of Fortune 500 companies.
Cursor Real reviews
Our Rating:
4.5
- Verified Users
- Verified Users
Compare Alternatives
See how Cursor stacks up against competitors
Get Your Free Checklist
Enter your email to download instantly
No spam. Instant access. Unsubscribe anytime.
Download
Spam
Forever
Cursor’s Pros & Cons
Balanced evaluation to help you make an informed decision
Strengths
- AI-native editor with Agent, Tab and cloud agents in one tool
- Cloud Agents and Automations for parallel background work
- Bugbot AI code review on GitHub pull requests
- Cursor’s own Composer 2.5 model plus Grok and third-party models
- Cursor Router for cost or intelligence-based routing on Teams
- Deployed at more than half of the Fortune 500
- G2 reviewers rate ease of use 9.2 out of 10
Limitations
- Plus excludes Auto, Cloud Agents, Bugbot and third-party models
- Third-party models bill extra at API list price
- Default Privacy Mode began allowing session data for Grok training in June 2026, per reports
- Brand and product roadmap may shift under SpaceXAI ownership
- Gartner reviewers cite a limited extension marketplace and heavy resource use
- Trustpilot reviewers report billing issues and hard-to-reach support
Our Verdict
Cursor earns its Best in Features placement for AI coding assistants because no competitor packs as many agentic capabilities into one editor. Premium and above include Agent, Cloud Agents and Automations, Bugbot code review, Cursor’s own Composer 2.5 model and third-party model access. Teams add Cursor Router and usage analytics. Customers report major gains, from monday.com’s 2-5x engineering velocity to Coinbase cutting months of refactoring to days. Buyers should weigh that depth against cost and ownership changes. Plus at $8 excludes most agent features, third-party models bill extra, and Cursor is now part of SpaceXAI. Reports say its default Privacy Mode began allowing session data for Grok training in June 2026, so teams should check their settings. For engineering teams that want the most capable AI editor, Cursor leads. Teams prioritizing enterprise support may prefer GitHub Copilot.
Resources
Resources & Documentation
Detailed materials for deeper evaluation
Cursor Pricing Page
Free, Plus, Premium, Super, Ultra, Teams and Enterprise plans.
Pricing And Plans Help Article
Usage pools, model billing, legacy plans and Cursor Router details.
Models And Pricing Documentation
Composer, Grok and third-party model rates.
Cursor Customers Page
Testimonials from monday.com, Upwork, Coinbase, Rippling and Sentry.
Bugbot Overview
How Bugbot reviews GitHub pull requests.
Cloud Agents Documentation
Running agents in the background on cloud environments.
Cursor Security And Privacy
Privacy Mode settings and data handling.
Cursor Status Page
Live service status and incident history.
What to Know
What to Know Before Buying
-
Gartner reviewers say the basics take about an hour to learn
-
Rippling grew from 150 to 500+ engineers in a few weeks
-
Admins should review Privacy Mode settings after the SpaceX acquisition
-
Cursor is built on a VS Code-style editor, integrates with GitHub pull requests through Bugbot, and connects to cloud environments for background agents.
-
Teams seats come in $30, $100 or $200 tiers, and Enterprise pools usage across Grok and Cursor for large organizations.
-
Third-party models at API list price, higher seat tiers for heavy agent use and Cursor Token Rate charges on routed requests add to seat prices.
-
VS Code users can switch with familiar workflows, though some extensions may be unavailable, and legacy Pro and Teams plans are no longer sold to new customers.
-
Individual plans are billed monthly or annually, Teams is billed per seat and Enterprise offers invoice billing under custom terms.
Alternatives
Compare Alternatives
See how Cursor stacks up against competitors
Copilot works across many IDEs with GitHub-native workflows and 24/7 enterprise support options, while Cursor offers deeper agent features, Bugbot and its own models in one editor.
Replit builds and hosts complete apps in the browser for any skill level, while Cursor gives professional developers advanced agents inside a full code editor.
Loading comparison…
Get Started
Ready to Get Started?
Get personalized recommendations from top 3 vendors
By submitting, you agree to receive recommendations from verified vendors. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Are You a Software Vendor?
List your company and get in front of decision-makers actively searching for solutions.
FAQ’s
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Cursor
Plus costs $8 a month, Premium $30, Super $100 and Ultra $200. Teams seats cost $30, $100 or $200 per user per month, and Enterprise is custom priced.
Premium and above include Bugbot, Cloud Agents, Automations, Auto mode and third-party models. Plus includes Agent with Cursor and Grok models only.
SpaceX completed its $60 billion all-stock acquisition of Cursor’s parent, Anysphere, in August 2026, and Cursor is being absorbed into SpaceXAI.
Cursor includes its own Composer 2.5 model and Grok 4.5 to 4.7 in a weekly usage pool, with third-party models billed at API list price on Premium and above.
Reports say Cursor’s default Privacy Mode began allowing session data for Grok training in June 2026, so teams with proprietary code should review their privacy settings.
All users can contact support through Cursor’s help center, and Enterprise includes priority support. G2 reviewers rate support 8.5 out of 10.
Limited features on Plus, extra cost for third-party models, privacy and roadmap questions after the acquisition, and billing complaints on Trustpilot.
Common alternatives include GitHub Copilot, Replit, Claude Code, Windsurf and Amazon Q Developer, which differ in editor, agent depth and support.